Section

President Trump directs US negotiators against rushing an agreement with Iran, intensifying scrutiny over the ongoing Strait of Hormuz blockade and conflicting political reactions to the potential framework.
U.S. President Donald Trump declared on Sunday, May 24, 2026, that he has explicitly instructed American negotiators "not to rush into a deal" with Iran. This directive comes as anticipation and mounting criticism surround a potential agreement aimed at ending the ongoing war in the Middle East.
The President emphasized via his Truth Social account that negotiations are proceeding in an "orderly and constructive manner." He stated, "I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side." This statement underscores a strategic pause in diplomatic efforts, contrasting with earlier rapid developments in the conflict.
The context for this caution is the severe economic and military pressure currently applied to Tehran. Since April 13, the United States has maintained a stringent blockade of Iranian ports. This measure was enacted after Tehran virtually halted traffic through the economically vital Strait of Hormuz. The halt was a direct response to US-Israeli attacks on Iran that began on February 28. Trump noted that "The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed."
While the White House has kept the specifics of the proposed agreement under wraps, indications from both sides suggest significant progress. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmaeil Baqaei, revealed on state television on Saturday, May 23, that the two sides are nearing a "memorandum of understanding, a kind of framework agreement composed of 14 clauses." Baqaei described the current diplomatic trend as one toward "rapprochement."
According to reports from news outlet Axios, leaked aspects of the potential deal include a 60-day extension of the current ceasefire. During this period, the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened to traffic, allowing Iran to freely sell its oil. Furthermore, negotiations would continue regarding Iran’s nuclear program. Trump reinforced the non-negotiable nature of certain terms, stating, "Our relationship with Iran is becoming a much more professional and productive one. They must understand, however, that they cannot develop or procure a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb."
Despite the diplomatic maneuvers, fierce opposition has emerged within the Trump administration’s own ranks. Several voices, particularly Republican lawmakers close to the President, have expressed deep fears that the agreement favors Iran. The primary concern stems from leaked details suggesting benefits for Tehran, including the ability to resume oil sales and a prolonged cease-fire.
Roger Wicker, the top Republican senator overseeing defense policy, voiced stark opposition. He argued that agreeing to a "rumored 60-day ceasefire" would mean "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!" This comment highlights the perceived military stakes, suggesting that diplomatic concessions might negate recent strategic gains.
Fellow Republican senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham also joined the criticism. They opposed the prospect of Iran gaining immediate economic benefits, such as unrestricted oil sales. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas wrote on X, "If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime - still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America' - now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake." Cruz’s remarks reflect a hardline stance, fearing that the deal legitimizes a hostile regime.
Thom Tillis, a Republican senator from North Carolina, also expressed skepticism, stating simply that the deal "doesn't make sense to me." The divergence between the executive branch’s diplomatic approach and the legislative branch’s skepticism creates a complex political landscape. Trump’s insistence on taking time to "get it right" suggests an awareness of these internal pressures. He added, "Both sides must take their time and get it right," while simultaneously criticizing the 2015 nuclear deal agreed upon by former President Barack Obama.
The current standoff between the United States and Iran, underscored by the persistent Strait of Hormuz blockade, indicates a critical juncture in Middle Eastern geopolitics. President Trump’s decision to halt the rush toward a final Iran-US peace deal suggests that the administration is prioritizing long-term leverage over immediate resolution. The looming 60-day ceasefire framework, which would reopen shipping lanes and allow Iranian oil sales, poses significant political risks for Republicans who view such concessions as validating a hostile regime. If the negotiations proceed without addressing the core concerns of defense hawks like Senators Cruz and Wicker, the potential agreement could face legislative obstruction or public backlash. Conversely, if the blockade remains indefinitely, global oil markets and regional stability remain precarious. The coming weeks will be decisive in determining whether the "orderly and constructive" talks result in a durable framework or deepen the divide between the executive and legislative branches regarding Middle East policy.
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
Bangladesh Opposition Mobilizes Against India-Bangladesh Border Push-Ins and BSF Killings
Join 50,000+ readers getting the global briefing every morning.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jun 11, 2026 17:40 UTC
Boelter Pleads Guilty in Minnesota Political Assassinations
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
Bangladesh Opposition Mobilizes Against India-Bangladesh Border Push-Ins and BSF Killings
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
John Healey Quits as UK Defence Secretary Over Funding Dispute
Jun 11, 2026 16:19 UTC
UK Defence Secretary John Healey Quits Over Funding Dispute