Section

US President Donald Trump clashed fiercely with Benjamin Netanyahu over Israeli escalation in Lebanon, blocking strikes and influencing ongoing Iran US negotiations.
In a rare and heated exchange, US President Donald Trump engaged in a volatile phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, directly intervening in Israel’s military operations in Lebanon. The confrontation, described by officials as one of the most difficult since Trump returned to office, resulted in Trump explicitly blocking Israel’s planned strikes on Beirut while expressing profound frustration over the regional escalation.
Two US officials and a third source told Axios that Trump’s anger was palpable as he accused Netanyahu of ingratitude and poor strategic judgment. The President reportedly used strong language, telling the Prime Minister, “You’re f****** crazy. You'd be in prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your a**. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.” While Trump acknowledged Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel and Israel’s right to self-defense, he argued that Netanyahu had escalated the conflict disproportionately. Sources indicated that Trump was particularly concerned about the extensive destruction and civilian casualties resulting from strikes targeting individual Hezbollah commanders.
The timing of this intervention is critical, as the region stands on the precipice of further diplomatic collapse. According to reports, Iran has threatened to suspend negotiations with the United States over Israel’s actions in Lebanon. This geopolitical tension is compounded by the fact that an Iran US negotiations memorandum currently being discussed includes provisions specifically calling for an end to the fighting in Lebanon. The issue of Lebanon has historically caused friction between Trump and Netanyahu, but this latest exchange marks a significant point of divergence in their foreign policy approach.
Following the call, Trump took to Truth Social to state that talks with Iran were “continuing, at a rapid pace,” suggesting an attempt to keep diplomatic channels open despite the military disagreements. However, the situation on the ground remained fraught with uncertainty. An Israeli official confirmed to Axios that Israel no longer planned to strike Hezbollah targets in Beirut, a direct reversal that aligned with the President’s wishes. Despite this, Netanyahu later issued a statement asserting that he had informed Trump that Israel would strike targets in Beirut if Hezbollah continued its attacks, maintaining that Israeli operations in southern Lebanon would proceed.
A second US official clarified the outcome of the conversation, stating that Trump had effectively overruled Netanyahu during the call, leading the Israeli leader to back down from the immediate plan to strike the capital. This indicates that while Netanyahu retains operational command in certain theaters, he is not immune to US presidential pressure, particularly when it involves major allied nations like Iran. The Trump Netanyahu call thus served as a decisive moment where American diplomatic priorities regarding Iran appeared to temporarily supersede Israeli military objectives in Lebanon.
The core of the disagreement appears to be strategic rather than just tactical. Trump’s anger seems rooted in the potential damage to broader US interests, including the fragile peace process with Iran. By labeling the situation as one where “everybody hates Israel,” Trump highlighted the diplomatic isolation he perceives Netanyahu’s actions are causing. This is a stark contrast to the usual supportive rhetoric often found in US-Israel relations, signaling a shift in how the current administration views the costs of the Lebanon conflict.
The outcome of this intense diplomatic clash will likely determine the stability of the entire region. If the US successfully leverages its influence to halt Israeli strikes in Beirut, it may create the necessary conditions for the Lebanon ceasefire to move forward in the ongoing talks with Iran. However, Netanyahu’s insistence on continuing operations in southern Lebanon suggests that military tensions remain high. Future developments will depend on whether Trump’s pressure can withstand Israeli military momentum. If Iran perceives any deviation from the ceasefire provisions, the suspended negotiations may not resume, potentially leading to a wider regional conflict. The current pause in Beirut strikes is a critical window of opportunity that must be utilized to prevent further escalation and secure a lasting diplomatic resolution.
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
Bangladesh Opposition Mobilizes Against India-Bangladesh Border Push-Ins and BSF Killings
Join 50,000+ readers getting the global briefing every morning.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jun 11, 2026 17:40 UTC
Boelter Pleads Guilty in Minnesota Political Assassinations
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
Bangladesh Opposition Mobilizes Against India-Bangladesh Border Push-Ins and BSF Killings
Jun 11, 2026 17:21 UTC
John Healey Quits as UK Defence Secretary Over Funding Dispute
Jun 11, 2026 16:19 UTC
UK Defence Secretary John Healey Quits Over Funding Dispute