According to Jamvanti, the detention began when she and her family were stopped in Ayodhya. She claimed that Raj Singh was taken away by police personnel while she was kept overnight at a women’s police station. “I did not know what had happened to my son. The next morning, around 11 or 12, I was briefly allowed to meet him,” she alleged. She further claimed that officials informed her that a Kolkata police team had arrived to take Raj Singh away by flight for questioning in connection with the case. “They said it was only for interrogation and that he would be released later, but since then we have had no information about where exactly he is,” she alleged, expressing concern over the lack of updates on her son’s whereabouts.

Maintaining her son’s innocence, Jamvanti claimed that Raj Singh had remained with the family between May 1 and May 9 and had not traveled elsewhere. To substantiate her claims, she pointed to digital evidence, stating, “We have cameras at home. We went shopping in the city and bought items. Everything can be checked.” She also alleged that Raj Singh attended wedding functions on May 7 and 8 before being detained on May 9 and allegedly taken away the following day. This timeline places him in Uttar Pradesh, far from the North 24 Parganas location where Chandranath Rath was ambushed.

The murder of Chandranath Rath, the personal assistant to Suvendu Adhikari, has triggered a high-profile inquiry. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising seven members has been formed by the CBI to probe the death. The case has drawn significant political attention in West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh, with allegations and counter-allegations flying between political circles. The arrest of Raj Singh, a resident of Ballia, was a pivotal moment in the investigation, leading to intense scrutiny of the police’s methods and the evidence presented.

Jamvanti Singh’s public statement adds a new layer of complexity to the probe. By asserting that her son was in Lucknow and Ayodhya during the time of the murder, she undermines the prosecution’s reliance on his alleged presence at the crime scene. The reference to CCTV footage and shrine visitors suggests a strategy to build a robust alibi through documentary and eyewitness testimony. However, the family’s subsequent interception and Raj Singh’s transfer to Kolkata police custody remain points of contention.

Jamvanti broke down repeatedly during her interaction with journalists, appealing to authorities and the central government for justice. “My son has done nothing wrong. Please conduct a proper investigation and find out the truth,” she said, highlighting the emotional toll on the family and the perceived urgency for an impartial review of the case. Her claims emphasize the need for transparent verification of the alleged sharpshooter’s movements during the critical dates in question.

Political Ramifications Shape Future Investigative Trajectory

The rejection of police theories by Raj Singh’s mother in the Raj Singh case underscores the fragile nature of evidence in high-stakes political murders. As the CBI continues its probe into the death of Chandranath Rath, the conflict between the family’s alibi and official narratives may lead to stricter judicial scrutiny of investigative timelines. This dynamic could result in a prolonged legal process, emphasizing the need for irrefutable digital and physical evidence to secure convictions or dismissals in politically charged environments.