
Hegseth and Trump Face Backlash Over School Strike Controversy
New reports suggest a US airstrike mistakenly hit an Iranian elementary school, raising concerns about AI targeting systems during the ongoing conflict.
The recent escalation between the United States and Israel against Iran has resulted in significant controversy following a deadly aerial strike on an Iranian elementary school. Multiple sources familiar with the operation indicate that the Shajarah Tayyiba building was on a US target list but may have been misidentified as a military site. This incident occurred during the initial hours of the massive campaign, killing at least 175 people, including numerous children. The attack took place around 10:45 a.m. local time on Feb. 28, just as parents were hurrying to take their kids home.
AI and Targeting Errors
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has maintained that civilians are never targeted by US forces, yet a preliminary Pentagon investigation suggests otherwise. The strike appears to have been conducted by the US military due to intelligence errors regarding the target location. Reports indicate outdated targeting data may have led officials to believe the school was a factory or arms depot. Both nations are utilizing advanced AI tools like Palantir’s Maven and Anthropic’s Claude to process vast amounts of data rapidly. Adm. Brad Cooper noted that while humans make final decisions, AI systems turn processes that took days into seconds. Israel has conducted over 6,000 strikes on 3,400 targets, while US Central Command hit 5,500 sites as of Wednesday.
Witness Accounts and Weaponry
Survivors describe a terrifying sequence of events on Feb. 28. Abdollah Karyanipak, a local government worker, witnessed the explosion around 10:45 a.m. He heard a missile strike the school while parents were gathering to pick up children. The blast collapsed the entrance and caused multiple subsequent explosions. Videos shared online appear to show a Tomahawk cruise missile striking near the facility. Experts note that only a handful of allied nations possess these weapons, excluding Iran or Israel. President Donald Trump suggested without evidence that Iran might have attacked their own school with Tomahawks, despite the weapon not being part of their arsenal. Karyanipak described finding his younger son only by his shoes, as the body was unrecognizable from the blast.
Building History and Expert Analysis
The school used to be part of an Iranian naval base and may still be affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy. However, it had been walled off since 2015, with separate entrances added between mid-2015 and early 2016. Satellite imagery shows an outdoor play area as early as 2017 on Google Earth. The complex’s layout changed again in 2022, when additional walls separated what is now a medical clinic from the other surrounding buildings. Experts have stated that the locations of the school and clinic adjacent to or within the larger IRGC compound do not make them legitimate targets. Human Rights Watch has called for a war crime investigation on the attack. It remains unclear whether there were casualties at the nearby medical clinic.
Key Takeaways
- Preliminary investigation indicates US fault in striking the school due to outdated data.
- AI tools used for target identification may have contributed to the error during mass operations.
- At least 175 casualties reported, mostly children killed in the Shajarah Tayyiba attack.
- Hegseth claims adversaries fire from schools despite lack of evidence or Tomahawk ownership by Iran.
Summary
The incident has drawn international condemnation and calls for war crime investigations regarding the use of AI in modern warfare. As investigations continue, questions remain about the reliance on automated systems in high-intensity conflicts and the accountability for civilian casualties. Hegseth’s office referred questions about the school strike to Centcom, which declined to comment citing a pending investigation.







