The protest featured prominent figures from civil society, including 83-year-old screenwriter and director Saeed Akhtar Mirza, who participated from a wheelchair. Mirza expressed solidarity with the younger generation, stating, “These children have faced so much. History is being created and I want to be a part of it.” He further criticized the government, adding, “This regime is corrupt, communal and criminal. It should go.”

Aditi, a student journalist who had previously filed a complaint alleging sexual harassment and manhandling by a police officer during Saturday’s protest, returned to the demonstration on Sunday. Her presence underscored the personal risks activists were willing to take. Aditi declared, “I am back at the protest today. I do not care if I am detained or if they try to do anything. I feel whatever is happening is not right, and we have to fight. If we will not, then who will?”

AISA president Neha was also detained for the third consecutive time during the day’s events. She was taken away around 5 p.m. from Ashoka Road, near the Shangri-La hotel, in a private SUV by male police personnel who allegedly lacked name badges. AISA immediately demanded her release, noting that her associates had not been initially informed of her whereabouts. She was later released from the Narela Industrial Area police station around 8 p.m. Following her release, Neha condemned the repeated detentions, framing the protests as a necessary assertion of civic rights.

“They think we are dogs, cockroaches or insects - that they can pick us up, throw us into vehicles, take us 50 kilometres away, beat us and push us around,” Neha stated. “But today we showed that we are citizens of this country. We have the right to question those in power and ask how the Election Commission and the ruling party are dealing with our votes. If we are repeatedly detained for protesting at a designated protest site, then returning to that place and reclaiming our right to protest is also our right.”

The crackdown highlights the deepening tension between civil society organizations and state authorities over the perceived integrity of the electoral process. The demand for the scrapping of the Special Intensive Revision and the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner reflects broader concerns regarding political accountability. As police continue to utilize detention vehicles and physical force to disperse gatherings, the incident underscores the fragility of protest rights in the capital. The return of detained journalists and student leaders to the streets suggests that the mobilization against the current electoral revision is likely to persist, challenging the government's narrative of administrative normalcy. The use of private buses for detention and the alleged mishandling of women protesters have further inflamed public sentiment, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of police conduct in future demonstrations.

Delhi Police Tactics Escalate Amidst Election Controversy

The third-day detention of hundreds of protesters signals a hardening of police strategy against civil dissent regarding electoral reforms. Based on the source material, the immediate deployment of rapid reaction forces and the use of private vehicles for mass detention indicate an intent to suppress visibility rather than manage the crowd. The repeated arrests of key organizational figures like AISA’s president and the detention of journalists suggest a targeted approach to disrupt leadership. If the government does not address the core allegations regarding the electoral rolls, the pattern of daily marches and subsequent mass detentions is likely to continue, potentially drawing greater national attention to the controversy surrounding the Chief Election Commissioner's tenure.